The population of the Sub-Saharan
region increased by 670 million between 1990 and 2005. According to the latest global population
projections published by the United Nations in 2007, 80% of the world's
population growth will be concentrated in developing countries where pressures
on food production due to climate change are also predicted to be highly intensified. Due to the joint intensifications of climate
change and population growth expected in these regions, studies of agricultural
mitigation and its efficacy in boosting crop yields are now vital to future
policy decisions. Population and climate
changes will increase food requirements and make growing those foodstuffs even
more difficult. With the Sub-Saharan
population predicted to grow to between 1.5 and 2 billion between now and 2050,
agricultural responses to climate change must begin now to maintain future food
security in the region. Di Falco et al. analyzed geographic climate and yield
data in a simultaneous equations model with endogenous switching to account for
unobservable factors or skills that effect food productivity and individual
farmers' decisions to adapt their techniques to changing climate.—Michael
Gazeley-Romney
Di Falco, S., Varonesi, M., Yesuf,
M., 2011. Does Adaptation to Climate Change Provide Food Security? A
Micro-Perspective from Ethiopia. American Journal of Agricultural Economics.
93, 829—846.
Di
Falco et al. elected to use a pre-existingan Ethiopian database of climate
values and crop yields of the five major annual crops (teff, maize, wheat,
barley, and beans) in considering the future food security of the region. Ethiopia, having less than 60% of observed
farms employing irrigation, 95% of the national yield being produced on family
farms, and 75% of that yield being consumed at the household level typifies the
poor, rain-fed regions where production in rain-fed agriculture is predicted to
fall 50% by 2020 according to a 2007 IPCC report. This makes it an ideal sample
population. The team analyzed seasonally
disaggregated climatic data at the individual farm level through a simultaneous
equations model with endogenous switching using the thin plate spline method of
spatial interpolation, inputting household specific rainfall and temperature
data at the correct geographic coordinates.
An important distinction in this
analysis is the use of real and predicted food production instead of land value
in analyzing the economic effects of climate change. Di Falco et al. insist that due to the high
primary consumption of food crops and inconsistent property rights in the
developing world, crop production is more readily linked to living conditions
than to land value. Subsistence farming
exists somewhat separate from the market system, making land market analysis an
unreliable indicator of well-being in the at risk regions.
In
the first phase of the analysis, the researchers surveyed 1000 households in 20
districts, sampling data from 50 farm units within each district. In surveying the farmers, Di Falco et al.
discovered a direct correlation between the availability of information on
climate change, access to credit, and the decision to adopt climate-adaptive
farming techniques. Most respondents
perceived rising temperature and falling annual precipitation, but 40—50% of
households because of lack of concrete information failed to act on their
perceptions of climate change. The importance
of education programs in the form of farmer-to-farmer education and government
extension is clear; especially in the developing world where literacy and access
to current climate research are low, education is the most important factor in
the ability of the population to adapt.
In
the second phase of analysis, the team analyzed the effects on food production
of the adoption of agricultural adaptation techniques including changing crop
varieties, adoption of soil and water conservation strategies, and tree
planting. There was a statistically
significant correlation between rainfall and food production only in the
households that did not adapt—leading the researchers to conclude that
adaptation techniques made farms less susceptible to the extreme weather
conditions that make food-production in the Sub-Saharan region difficult in the
first place. Crop rotation, which might
be a good adaptation strategy elsewhere is ineffective in Ethiopia because crops
are already highly diversified.
In
comparing the expected food productivity of the four test conditions
(households that did adapt, households that did not, and the production values
for those conditions if the opposite had been true; i.e. the households that
did not, had adapted) within the endogenous switching regression model Di Falco
et al. concluded that adapted households grew more food than non-adapted ones,
and that taking adaptive measures eliminated this discrepancy.
The
analysis of Di Falco et al. suggests that future policy objectives should be to
concentrate on farms that have not yet embraced climate-linked adaptation
techniques. The team points out the
obvious need for further research to differentiate the most effective methods
of adaptation, but the results demonstrate the importance in raising the productivity
in the bottom 1% performers in raising national food-production,
weather-proofing yield estimates, and increasing food security in the region.
0 comments:
Post a Comment